Skip to main content
· 12/11/1972

Richards v. Maryland

Citations

  • 409 U.S. 1062
  • 93 S. Ct. 570

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the plaintiffs “have not challenged the portions of the debarment decision finding that Leitman controls or has the power to control J.L. Surplus sales, and that, if Leitman was properly debarred, then J.L. Surplus was also properly debarred” (emphasis added)
  • setting forth the standard of review of administrative agency deci- sions under the APA
  • decision of Defense Logistics Agency that debarred plaintiff from purchasing government property under the Federal Acquisition Regulations
  • decision of Defense Logistics Agency that debarred plaintiff from purchasing government property under the Federal Acquisition Regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.