Arizona Supreme Court· 1/12/1961
Richards Development Company v. Sligh
Citations
- 358 P.2d 329
- 89 Ariz. 100
- 1961 Ariz. LEXIS 183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “parol evidence is not admissible to aid in the interpretation of the parties’ intentions until the four corners of the writing itself have been searched to determine whether the document itself affords a reasonably clear understanding of what the parties have agreed to do.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bernstein, Jennings, Lockwood, Struckmeyer, Udall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Richard W. Bosse v. Crowell Collier and MacMillanNinth Circuit· 1977-12-06· cited 89×
- Hauck v. Second National Bank of RichmondIndiana Court of Appeals· 1972-09-11· cited 89×
- Standage Ventures, Inc. v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1977-03-10· cited 51×
- Associated Students of the University v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-02-07· cited 33×
- University Realty & Development Co. v. Omid-Gaf, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-04-11· cited 31×
- Hofmann Company v. MeisnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-05-16· cited 31×
- Arizona Land Title & Trust Co. v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-07-05· cited 24×
- Viscount Air Services, Inc. v. Cole (In Re Viscount Air Services, Inc.)D. Arizona· 1998-10-28· cited 20×
- Ness v. Greater Arizona Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-10-07· cited 18×
- JPMCC 2007-CIBC 19 East Greenway, LLC v. Bataa/Kierland LLC (In re Bataa/Kierland LLC)D. Arizona· 2013-07-22· cited 12×
- Limberopoulos v. Tom Fannin and AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-04-03· cited 11×
- Lyon v. Big Bend Development Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-01-02· cited 11×
- Combs v. LufkinCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-05-23· cited 9×
- McCutchin v. SCA Services of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-10-02· cited 6×
- Mordka v. Mordka Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-09-05· cited 3×
- Arthen v. ChilleenArizona Supreme Court· 1968-02-29· cited 3×
- Vinnell Corp. v. State ex rel. SkousenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-11-04· cited 3×
- Davies v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-01-13· cited 2×
- Turley v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-05-10· cited 2×
- Smith v. Melson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-04-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.