Skip to main content
· 1/12/1961

Richards Development Company v. Sligh

Citations

  • 358 P.2d 329
  • 89 Ariz. 100
  • 1961 Ariz. LEXIS 183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “parol evidence is not admissible to aid in the interpretation of the parties’ intentions until the four corners of the writing itself have been searched to determine whether the document itself affords a reasonably clear understanding of what the parties have agreed to do.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bernstein, Jennings, Lockwood, Struckmeyer, Udall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.