Skip to main content
· 8/9/1966

Richards Contracting Company v. Fullmer Brothers

Citations

  • 417 P.2d 755
  • 18 Utah 2d 177
  • 1966 Utah LEXIS 418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that when “the parties decide on extras,” as happened in that case, “another contract in quasi contract arises based on a so-called quantum meruit theory”
  • discussing that a contract provision requiring written authorization for extra work is controlling, “except where the contractor verbally encourages the subcontractor to do the extra work with the express or implied promise that it would be paid for”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henriod, McDonough, Wade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.