Richard W. Nicolazzo and Pamela Nicolazzo v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying discovery rule to a medical malpractice claim arising under Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§1346(b) and 2675(a) et seq
• “[T]he factual predicate for [the plaintiff’s] medical malpractice claim could not have become apparent to him before receiving the correct diagnosis . . .”
• “It was only when [the plaintiff] received a correct diagnosis . . . that the factual predicate of his injury . . . became known to him.”
• “It was only when [the plaintiff] received a correct diagnosis . . . that the factual predicate of his injury . . . became known to him.”
• “It was only when [the plaintiff] received a correct diagnosis . . . that the factual predicate of his injury . . . became known to him.”
• “It was only when [the plaintiff] received a correct diagnosis . . . that the factual predicate of his injury . . . became known to him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).