Richard W. Neely v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company and Standard Oil Company of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining it is not the court’s role to weigh the credibility of witnesses 24 or other evidence when considering whether summary judgment is proper
• “Parties are entitled to have the determination of their rights rest on more than speculation and guesswork. Here, the connection between the proffered evidence and the conclusions is too tenuous to permit a jury to make it.”
• “Parties are entitled to have the determination of their rights rest on more than speculation and guesswork. Here, the connection between the proffered evidence and the conclusions is too tenuous to permit a jury to make it.”
• “In considering a motion for summary judgment, of course, 16 the court decides a pure question of law and is not permitted to weigh the evidence or to judge 17 the credibility of witnesses.”
• “Parties are entitled to have the determination of their rights rest on more than speculation and guesswork. Here, the connection between the proffered evidence and the conclusions is too tenuous to permit a jury to make it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).