Skip to main content
· 12/7/1998

Richard v. U.S. Repeating Arms Co.

Citations

  • 247 Conn. 948
  • 723 A.2d 322
  • 1998 Conn. LEXIS 469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • A trial court “can only bind ... the jury as to what evidence shall be considered by” the jury.
  • The legal definition of a “disorderly house” is a matter for the jury
  • The legal definition of a \disorderly house\ is a matter for the jury
  • “Whenever, however, the Judge has thought it proper to instruct, it has always been deemed necessary that he should be careful to put the instruction in an advisory form ....”
  • “The [trial court] ... cannot, by any instruction given in a criminal case, bind the jury as to the definition of the crime, or as to the legal effect of the evidence before them.” (Emphasis added)
  • “The [trial court] . . . cannot, by any instruction given in a criminal case, bind the jury as to the definition of the crime, or as to the legal effect of the evidence before them.” (Emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.