Richard v. Swiber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claim for improper commitment under the Baker Act resulting from erroneous blood and urine tests “clearly ar[ose] out of the rendering of medical services” and was subject to Fla. Stat. § 766.106

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).