Richard v. Marriott Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining “[a] court has the inherent power to hold a party in civil contempt in order ‘to enforce compliance with an order of the court or to compensate for losses or damages’” (quoting McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co., 336 U.S. 187, 191 (1949))
• “A court has the inherent power to hold a party in civil contempt in order to enforce compliance with an order of the court to compensate for losses or damages.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• discussing the civil contempt standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).