Richard v. Lafayette Fire & Police Civil Service Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that similarity between text of federal and state due process clauses supports ‘‘a common interpretation of the provi- sions’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that testimony simply describing defendant’s “arrogant” demeanor during 6 interview was not a Doyle violation
• noting that \ only the Supreme Court of Alaska has concluded that electronic recording is mandated by the due process clause of its state constitution\
• noting that “only the Supreme Court of Alaska has concluded that electronic recording is mandated by the due process clause of its state constitution”
• noting that federal and state provisions are subject to same interpretation because they have ‘‘shared genesis in the common law’’
• declining to impose electronic recording requirement during custo- dial interrogations that was not mandated by state con- stitution because legislature is better suited to decide policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).