· 1/29/1962
Richard v. Gifford-Hill & Co.
Citations
- 137 So. 2d 67
- 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1520
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that although not binding on us, we may cite federal authority for its persuasive value
- stating that “[f]ederal court decisions do not control the determinations of the Superior Court”
- stating “While foreign plaintiffs enjoy ‘less deference’ with regard to their choice of forum, their choice is still entitled to solicitude.”
- abuse of discretion for trial court to engage in “one-sided discussion” of factors weighing against plaintiff’s choice of forum
- abuse of discretion for trial court to engage in “one-sided discussion” of factors weighing against plaintiff’s choice of forum
- federal court decisions are not binding on this Court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frugé, Hood, Tate
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.