· 1/27/2006
Richard Tyler Dickens, Individually And As Special For The Estate Of Sharon Kenyon, Vs. Associated Anesthesiologists, P.c.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that Court lacks jurisdiction over interest abatement case because taxpayers’ original request for abatement was filed and denied before effective date of statute
- concluding that the Court lacks jurisdiction over an interest abatement case because taxpayers' original request for abatement was filed and denied before effective date of statute
- concluding that the Court lacks jurisdiction over an interest abatement case because taxpayers’ original request for abatement was filed and denied before effective date of statute
- declining to decide whether a final notice of determination under section 6404 was issued when the Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction
- we need not decide whether a document sent by the Commissioner is a final determination where we lack jurisdiction over a claim for interest abatement
- we need not decide whether a document sent by the Commissioner is a final determination where we lack jurisdiction over a claim for interest abatement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.