Richard T. Palmisano, II v. Allina Health Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a plan description that is \hopelessly inadequate as an SPD\ cannot be a valid basis for severance benefits
• affirming the district court’s finding of no reliance and implicitly viewing reliance and prejudice as synonymous
• affirming the grant of summary judgment, and dismissal of the defamation claim when, “after a thorough review of the record,” there was no evidence of actual malice
• reliance or prejudice must be shown

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).