Richard Stone v. Chung Pei Chemical Industry Co. Ltd and Taiwan Hi Dap Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pro se parties are not excused from following the rules and 22 orders of the court
• holding that pro se parties are not excused from following the rules and 21 orders of the court
• “Pro se litigants in the ordinary civil case should not be treated more 21 favorably than parties with attorneys of record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).