Skip to main content
· 3/24/1994

Richard Silva v. Peter Witschen, City of East Providence, Stephen Linder

Citations

  • 19 F.3d 725
  • 28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 420
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5488
  • 1994 WL 86217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting \claim that attorney fees reasonably incurred in the sanctions phase may not be made the subject of a Rule 11 sanction\
  • treating defense attorney’s comments to plaintiff’s counsel, in response to receiving copy of complaint before filing, that suit was unjustified and defendants intended to seek attorneys’ fees, as “substantially equivalent warning” to safe harbor
  • \[W]e cannot agree that a groundless civil rights action is any less appropriate a candidate for Rule 11 sanctions than other groundless actions.\
  • appellant must bear responsibility for omitting material items from appellate record
  • appellant bears brunt of failure to include pertinent material in record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Cyr, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.