Richard Pieper v. American Arbitration Association, Inc. R. Jeffrey Pollock Gerald Hambly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under Rooker-Feldman, federal courts lack subject-matter jurisdiction to engage in appellate review of state-court proceedings
• noting that attacks on the state court’s order compelling arbitration called into question the state court’s arbitration decision, and, accordingly, was inextricably intertwined with the federal claims in the case, within the meaning of Rooker–Feldman’s bar
• applying Rooker-Feldman even though “none” of the federal claims were “actually raised” in state court
• applying Rooker-Feldman even though “none of the[] [claims] w[ere] actually raised in the state-court litigation”
• applying Rooker-Feldman even though “none of the[] [claims] w[ere] actually raised in the state-court litigation”
• applying Rooker-Feldman even though “none of the[] [claims] was actually raised in the state-court litigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).