· 12/29/1978
Richard Murillo v. F. David Mathews, Secretary of the U. S. Department of Hew
Citations
- 588 F.2d 759
- 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 6693
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “‘[a]pplication of the rule requiring exhaustion 17 is not jurisdictional, but calls for the sound exercise of judicial discretion,’ [and] is not lightly to 18 be disregarded.”
- “Although the ‘(a)pplication of the rule requiring exhaustion is not jurisdictional, but calls for the sound exercise of judicial discretion,’ it is not lightly to be disregarded.”
- “Although the ‘(a)pplication of the rule requiring exhaustion is not jurisdictional, but calls for the sound exercise of judicial discretion,’ it is not lightly to be disregarded.”
- “Although the ‘(a)pplication of the rule requiring exhaustion is not jurisdictional, but calls for the sound exercise of judicial discretion,’ it is not lightly to be disregarded.”
- “Although the ‘(a)pplication of the rule requiring exhaustion is not jurisdictional, but calls 28 for the sound exercise of judicial discretion,’ it is not lightly to be disregarded.”
- “Although the application of the rule requiring 7 exhaustion is not jurisdictional, but calls for the sound exercise of judicial discretion, it is not lightly 8 to be disregarded.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Choy, Der, Heydt, Merrill, Von
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.