Skip to main content
· 12/29/1978

Richard Murillo v. F. David Mathews, Secretary of the U. S. Department of Hew

Citations

  • 588 F.2d 759
  • 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 6693

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “‘[a]pplication of the rule requiring exhaustion 17 is not jurisdictional, but calls for the sound exercise of judicial discretion,’ [and] is not lightly to 18 be disregarded.”
  • “Although the ‘(a)pplication of the rule requiring exhaustion is not jurisdictional, but calls for the sound exercise of judicial discretion,’ it is not lightly to be disregarded.”
  • “Although the ‘(a)pplication of the rule requiring exhaustion is not jurisdictional, but calls for the sound exercise of judicial discretion,’ it is not lightly to be disregarded.”
  • “Although the ‘(a)pplication of the rule requiring exhaustion is not jurisdictional, but calls for the sound exercise of judicial discretion,’ it is not lightly to be disregarded.”
  • “Although the ‘(a)pplication of the rule requiring exhaustion is not jurisdictional, but calls 28 for the sound exercise of judicial discretion,’ it is not lightly to be disregarded.”
  • “Although the application of the rule requiring 7 exhaustion is not jurisdictional, but calls for the sound exercise of judicial discretion, it is not lightly 8 to be disregarded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Choy, Der, Heydt, Merrill, Von

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.