· 4/3/2024
Richard Lussy v. Department of Legal Affairs etc.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that shouting epithets from a moving car did not provide probable cause to arrest the plaintiff under a disorderly-conduct statute
- holding that an officer could not rely solely on protected speech to establish probable cause
- holding that an officer could not rely solely on protected speech to establish probable cause
- holding that an officer could not rely solely on protected speech to establish probable cause
- holding that shouting epithets from a moving car did not provide probable cause to arrest the plaintiff under a disorderly-conduct statute
- holding that protected speech cannot serve as the basis for a violation of city ordinances at issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.