Richard L. Nevitt v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a motion for relief from judgment based on newly discovered evidence must be made within one year after judgment was entered
• finding Rule 60(b) motion untimely and one-year limitation period not tolled during appeal
• a district court lacks jurisdiction to consider an untimely motion to set aside a judgment
• “Since the Rule 60(b)(2) motion was 8 not filed within one year of entry of judgment, the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider 9 it.”
• motion for relief from judgment based on newly discovered evidence must be made within one year after judgment was entered
• expressly holding that “pendency of an appeal does not toll the one year period”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).