Richard L. Gordon v. James A. Hansen Lucinda Glen Kent Plummer Richard Anderson Richard Jarvis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a plaintiff failed to state a claim as he received the “procedural safeguards that the Due Process Clause requires” by “avail[ing] himself of the administrative hearing process to contest the Emergency Orders and appeal[ing] the Department’s orders”
• “An action under Bivens is almost identical to an action under section 1983, except that the former is maintained against federal officials while the latter is against state officials.” (citation omitted)
• “Section 1983 ... requires a causal relationship between a Defendants’ conduct and a plaintiffs constitutional deprivation. Absent such a relationship, the defendant is entitled to dismissal.”
• “Although the Due Process Clause requires a fair and impartial tribunal, we begin with a presumption that decision-makers are honest and impartial.” (internal quotation and alteration omitted)
• “We will not dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff cán prove no set of facts that would demonstrate an entitlement to relief.”
• “We will not dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts that would demonstrate an entitlement to relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).