Richard L. Dye v. United States Parole Commission, United States of America, and United States Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing commitment to discretion but reviewing decisions for abuse of discretion
• recognizing commitment to discretion but reviewing decisions for abuse of discretion
• “it is not the function of courts to review the Board’s discretion in denying parole or to repass on the credibility of reports received by the Board in making its determination”
• “The Commission does not function as an adversary to the prisoner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).