Richard J. Danzig, Secretary of the Navy v. Aec Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the failure to provide assurances of performance is a breach justifying termination for default
• noting that “the government [must] show that it was reasonable for the [governmental deci- sionmaker] to conclude that [the contractor] would be una- ble to complete the project by what the Board found to be the proper completion date”
• noting that “the government [must] show that it was reasonable for the [governmental deci- sionmaker] to conclude that [the contractor] would be una- ble to complete the project by what the Board found to be the proper completion date”
• relying on financial dispute with surety to explain failure to meet future deadline did not constitute adequate assurance, especially as contractor offered \no reason to believe that those difficulties would be resolved any time in the near future\
• default termination justified based on contractor’s repudiation and failure to provide adequate assurances in response to Cure Notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).