Richard Hoffman Corp. v. Loews Merrillville Cinemas, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiff's decision to report allegedly fraudulent conduct to only a single supervisor was evidence suggesting lack of subjective belief
• \[I]t would ... be unfair to expect a plaintiff seeking to inform his boss of financial misbehavior to have a working knowledge of the United States Code.\
• “[I]t would . . . be unfair to expect a plaintiff seeking to inform his boss of financial misbehavior to have a working knowledge of the United States Code.”
• “In rejecting the Federal Circuit’s narrow reading of the WPA, Congress made crystal clear its intent that any whistleblower who reports misconduct via one of the enumerated channels be protected under federal whistleblower statutes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).