Skip to main content
· 3/5/1992

Richard Haithcock v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General

Citations

  • 958 F.2d 671
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 3563
  • 58 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,356
  • 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 605
  • 1992 WL 39520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a continuing violation exists where a policy of discrimination is longstanding and manifested in discriminatory treatment in more than one instance
  • recognizing that a continuing violation exists where a policy of discrimination is longstanding and manifested in discriminatory treatment in more than one instance
  • stating that a complaint alleging discrimination may not be brought unless administrative remedies have been exhausted
  • acknowledging that court must determine the event that should have alerted average lay person to protect his rights, but nevertheless finding defendant engaged in a continuing violation
  • continuing violation within the scope of complaint of race and disability discrimination claims actually presented
  • applying the doctrine where, prior to the employer’s most recent action, “it appears that [the plaintiff] had no reason to complain”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Milburn, Contie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.