RICHARD GUTIERREZ AND LILIANA GUTIERREZ v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if the claims of a single plaintiff meet the jurisdictional threshold the court may assert supplemental jurisdiction over additional plaintiffs' claims
• holding that when a well-pleaded complaint contains “at least one” claim that satisfies the amount-in-controversy requirement, supplemental jurisdiction may be exercised over the claims of other parties
• holding that when a well-pleaded complaint contains \at least one\ claim that satisfies the amount-in-controversy requirement, supplemental jurisdiction may be exercised over the claims of other parties
• holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1367, the statute governing supplemental jurisdiction, broadened the jurisdiction of the federal courts
• recognizing that courts may occasionally resort to the use of legislative history in order to determine whether they have correctly interpreted ambiguous statutory text
• holding that 26 proper jurisdiction under Section 1332 requires complete diversity of citizenship, so each plaintiff must be diverse from each defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).