RICHARD GUTHRIE & ASSOC. v. Stone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognition of the mere existence of a disputed claim will not effect an interruption of prescription
• recognition of the mere existence of a disputed claim will not effect an interruption of prescription

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dear v. Mabile
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1994-05-20· cited 15×
• Smith v. McKeller
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1994-06-24· cited 9×
• Whitney National Bank v. Demarest
  Fifth Circuit· 1991-11-18· cited 1×
• Richard Guthrie & Associates v. Stone
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1990-10-05

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Flowers v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1980-04-09· cited 106×
• Griffith v. Roy
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1972-11-06· cited 31×
• Emery v. Cabral
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1981-06-02· cited 26×
• Marathon Ins. Co. v. Warner
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1971-02-02· cited 20×
• Jones v. Butler
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1977-05-09· cited 9×
• T. E. Mixon Lumber Co. v. Boutte
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1966-10-20· cited 6×
• Hilman v. Succession of Merrett
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1974-01-08· cited 4×
• Autin v. Parish of Lafourche
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1982-11-16· cited 4×