Richard Gennuso v. Commercial Bank & Trust Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reference by incorporation to another document describing property to which security interest relates held to be in violation of § 226.8(a)
• summary judgment for plaintiff on question of whether disclosure of security interest in nonexistent item is misleading
• “Any misgivings about the technical nature of the requirements under the Act or Regulation should be addressed to Congress and the Federal Reserve Board, not to this Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).