Skip to main content
· 8/20/2015

Richard Garner v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]he BIA’s decision must reflect a meaningful consideration of all the relevant evidence supporting an asylum seeker’s claims”
  • holding 9 Case: 24-60142 Document: 99-1 Page: 10 Date Filed: 01/24/2025 No. 24-60142 it is legal error to “fail[] to address . . . key evidence” even though we do not require the agency to specifically address every piece of evidence put before it
  • “[W]e must remand for the agency to comply with its established responsibility.” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.