Richard Gallose v. Long Island Railroad Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jury must decide whether coworker routinely brought dog to work in course of employment, and whether railroad's duty included duty to warn of heightened risk of dog bite
• “The catalyst which ignites [the duty to provide a safe workplace] is knowledge, either actual or constructive.”
• because railroad could have discovered presence of large dog on premises, injuries caused by dog bite were foreseeable
• “The catalyst which ignites [the duty to provide a safe workplace] is knowledge, either actual or constructive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).