Richard Feiner & Co. v. Larry Harmon Pictures Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Gee “relies heavily on a section from Moore’s Federal Practice, Second Edition, that has been deleted in the more recent edition.”
• refusing to dismiss Lanham Act claim for reverse passing off where, in addition to alleging false attribution, defendants allegedly claimed that they were the owners and licensors of the plaintiffs copyrighted film works
• refusing to dismiss Lan-ham Act claim for “reverse passing off’ where, in addition to alleging false copyright attribution, defendants allegedly claimed, in a video and a book, that they were the owners and licensors of the plaintiffs copyrighted film works

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).