Richard E. Dynes v. Army Air Force Exchange Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, because the case was dismissed without prejudice, it could not say that the district court abused its discretion
• holding that dismissal without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order was not an abuse of discretion
• holding that dismissal without prejudice, even for a minor violation of a court 18 order, was not an abuse of discretion
• holding that dismissal without prejudice, even for a minor violation of a court order to file a brief, was not an abuse of discretion
• holding that a dismissal without prejudice, even for a minor viola- tion of a court order, was not an abuse of discretion
• holding that dismissal without prejudice, even for a minor violation of a court order, was not an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).