Richard E. Driskill v. Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• following Coniglio and concluding that “the [seller has] a complete monopoly in the tied market ... and there can thus be no adverse effect on any competitors, even if a tying scheme exists”
• following Coniglio and concluding that “the [seller has] a complete monopoly in the tied market . . . and there can thus be no adverse effect on any competitors, even if a tying scheme exists”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).