Richard E. Collins v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Fifth Amendment’s “due process clause does not obligate the government to pay money damages”
• noting that the MCA and the MPCECA have identical language regarding finality of a settlement
• finding that the Due Process clauses “do not trigger Tucker Act jurisdiction in the courts”
• noting that the MCA and the MPCECA have “the same identical words” regarding settling military claims and have “exactly the same words regarding finality of settlement”
• finding that the plain language of the Military Claims Act, which states that “the settlement of a claim under [the Act] is final and conclusive,” provides clear and convincing evidence of legislative intent to preclude judicial review
• holding due process clause is not money-mandating

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).