Skip to main content
· 7/8/2011

Richard DeLauro v. Ralph F. Porto

Citations

  • 645 F.3d 1294
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 13941
  • 55 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 25

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding Supreme Court’s “bright line rale,” that issue of attorneys’ fees is always collateral to the merits, applies in bankruptcy cases, and thus fee issues do not affect finality
  • “[T]he failure to cite the proper legal authority for a proposition is a failure of legal pleading; at most it is bad lawyering.”
  • “As for DeLauro’s appeal to the district court of the denial of his objections to the discharge, ... we can and do decide that the appeal was colorable (non-frivolous enough
  • “As for DeLauro’s appeal to the district court of the denial of his objections to the discharge, ... we can and do decide that the appeal was colorable (non-frivolous enough

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Carnes, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.