Richard Dale Peterson v. James A. Gammon, and Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “ordinary meaning of the word ‘pending’…includes the entire period during which a notice of appeal from a denial of post-conviction review would be timely, assuming such a notice was in fact filed”
• stating that the “ordinary meaning of the word ‘pending’…includes the entire period during which a notice of appeal from a denial of post-conviction review would be timely, assuming such a notice was in fact filed”
• stating that the “ordinary meaning of the word ‘pending’...includes the entire period during which a notice of appeal from a denial of post-conviction review would be timely, assuming such a notice was in fact filed”
• stating that the “ordinary meaning of the word ‘pending’ . . . includes the entire period during which a notice of appeal from a denial of post- conviction review would be timely, assuming such a notice was in fact filed”
• prisoners convicted before the effective date of the AEDPA had one year, until April 24, 1997, to file a federal habeas action, plus any additional time during which the deadline was “tolled”
• “Prisoners whose judgments of conviction became final before the effective date of AEDPA are given a one-year period after that date, or until April 24, 1997, plus any additional periods during which the statute is tolled.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).