· 10/31/1995
Richard D. Ekstrom v. Value Health, Inc.
Citations
- 68 F.3d 1391
- 314 U.S. App. D.C. 340
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30960
- 1995 WL 633523
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Connecticut’s 30-day time limit to file petition to vacate, due to contractual terms
- “undisputed connection” to chosen jurisdiction where one party operated principally within that jurisdiction
- applying Connecticut law when defendant operated principally in the state
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edwards, Wald, Randolph
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.