Skip to main content
· 10/31/1995

Richard D. Ekstrom v. Value Health, Inc.

Citations

  • 68 F.3d 1391
  • 314 U.S. App. D.C. 340
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30960
  • 1995 WL 633523

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Connecticut’s 30-day time limit to file petition to vacate, due to contractual terms
  • “undisputed connection” to chosen jurisdiction where one party operated principally within that jurisdiction
  • applying Connecticut law when defendant operated principally in the state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Wald, Randolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.