Skip to main content
· 11/22/2002

Richard Chalk v. Robert L. Kuhlmann, Superintendent of Sullivan Correctional Facility

Citations

  • 311 F.3d 525
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 23972
  • 2002 WL 31627107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even if counsel’s performance fell below minimum standards, this did not constitute a deprivation of the constitutional right to counsel, because the petitioner had no constitutional right to counsel for the filing of the application at issue
  • noting that the application for leave to file an appeal to the state’s highest court is not a part of the direct appeal to the intermediate court but is the first step of the subsequent discretionary appeal
  • \Whether the appeal will be heard in the Court of Appeals is a discretionary decision.\
  • \Whether the appeal will be heard in the Court of Appeals is a discretionary decision.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miner, Leval, Pooler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.