Richard C. Fournier v. Eric K. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Manual M21-1 provision at issue did \not establish or alter the criteria for benefits but only illuminates a suggested procedural practice for VA adjudicators\
• holding that the Manual M21-1 provision at issue did “not establish or alter the criteria for benefits but only illuminates a suggested procedural practice for VA adjudicators”
• Manual provision is not a substantive rule if it does not \establish or alter the criteria for benefits\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).