Skip to main content
· 1/20/2022

Richard Benitez v. Appel Ford, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, the party opposing the railroad’s claim of property bears the burden of establishing that the railroad took less property than what was permitted by legislative act; the presumption is the railroad took the maximum property allowable under the legislative act
  • stating that, the Pennsylvania Railroad Act of February 19, 1849 provided railroads a right to appropriate land “not to exceed 60 feet in width, except where it might take more at deep cuttings, high embankments, or places selected for sidings, turn-outs, depots, [and] engine or water stations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.