Richard B. Dunlap v. Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court 2 The defendants cite Magluta v. Samples, 162 F.3d 662 (11th Cir. 1998), contending that it permitted the district court, under local rule 7.1(B
• concluding that, although the district court improperly relied on a local rule setting deadlines 4 designed to provide for relief to injured employees, while also protecting employers from excessive recoveries of damages.” , 350 Ga. App. 195, 197 (2019
• holding district court did not err in treating motion for summary judgment as unopposed when it considered the merits of the motion
• affirming district court that treated motion for summary judgment as unopposed because no response was filed within the time required under the local rules
• Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit holds that \[l]ocal rules may serve the purpose of giving the notice required by Rule 56.\
• Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit holds that “[l]ocal rules may serve the purpose of giving the notice required by Rule 56.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).