Richard and Sandra Finchum v. Ford Motor Company and Kia Motors Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing, sua sponte, an untimely amendment to a bill of costs where “the latter bill corrects computation errors in [the payor’s] favor”
• upholding exclusion under Rule 403 of evidence suggesting defendant had engaged in inappropriate conduct not at issue
• affirming the district court’s exclusion of tests where they could confuse and prejudice the jury
• affirming an award of costs under § 1920(4) for “copies of medical records” that were “necessarily obtained for use in the case”
• upholding per diem costs and court reporter’s delivery charges as incidental to depositions
• “Under Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, * * * the ultimate decision to award costs is within the district court’s discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).