Richard Alvin Otey v. Commonwealth of Virginia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that unpublished opinions are not binding but can be “considered for their persuasive value”
• noting that unpublished opinions are persuasive but not binding precedent
• noting that unpublished opinions are persuasive but not binding precedent
• “Although not binding precedent, unpublished opinions can be cited and considered for their persuasive value.”
• “Although not binding precedent, unpublished opinions can be cited and considered for their persuasive value.”
• “Although -4- “[T]he Commonwealth is not required to put on DNA evidence, eyewitness testimony, or obtain a defendant’s confession” to prove its case. Davis v. Commonwealth, 65 Va. App. 485, 502 (2015

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).