Richard A. Moore v. Muncie Police and Fire Merit Commission, Mike Szakaly, David Eiler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that applicant does not have property interest in prospective public employment without a “‘mutually explicit understanding’ between the parties” (quoting Crim v. Bd. of Educ. of Cairo Sch. Dist. No. 1, 147 F.3d 535, 545 (7th Cir. 1998))
• recognizing that applicant does not have property interest in prospective public employment without a “ ‘mutually explicit understanding 1 between the parties” (quoting Crim v. Bd. of Educ. of Cairo Sch. Dist. No. 1, 147 F.3d 535, 545 (7th Cir. 1998))
• “We have also previously held that an employee has no property interest in a prospective promotion, even when placed on an eligibility or ranking list.”
• while addressing the issue of a property interest in prospective employment, noting in passing that an employee does not have a property interest in prospective promotion
• while addressing the issue of a property interest in prospective employment, noting in passing that an employee does not have a property interest in prospective promotion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).