Richard A. Canatella v. John K. Van De Kamp Marie M. Moffat Jay Goldman Nancy McCarthy California Bar Journal Robert Hawley Zanassi Martha Daetwyler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant 23 posting the defendant’s “disciplinary record in a different section of the same website did not give rise to a new cause of action”
• noting that 12 starting in 2003, personal injury actions in California must be brought within two years after the 13 cause of action arose
• explaining that a one-year statute of limitations applies to any cause of action that was more than one-year old as of January 1, 2003
• explaining that a First Amendment claim accrued at the time of the alleged injury
• holding the defendant did not republish the plaintiff‟s disciplinary summary when he added a “verbatim copy” of the summary to a different URL within the same domain name
• noting that 42 24 U.S.C. § 1983 contains no statute of limitations, so federal courts in California typically apply the 25 state’s “statute of limitations for personal injury actions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).