Richard A. Campana v. John T. Eller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t of course is axiomatic that a defendant is entitled to know the nature and extent of the claim being made against him.”
• the plaintiff did not indicate that the Rule 15(b)(2) motion was prompted by newly discovered facts or an intervening change in law and the record indicated that the motion was filed in response to a question from the deliberating jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).