Skip to main content
· 4/20/1990

Richard A. Banks v. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary of the Navy

Citations

  • 901 F.2d 1084

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • retaining jurisdiction over Privacy Act and First Amendment claims even when lack of money-mandating provision required dismissal of the Little Tucker Act claims
  • finding Plaintiff had no right to back pay when he performed no reserve drills after his lawful transfer
  • members of Reserve components may not maintain actions for the pay and allowances they might have received for performing inactive training duties, absent their having performed those duties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nies, Michel, Beer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.