Rich v. Saloman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If this be error, it is harmless error since the lower court, in its opinion for the court en banc, indicated that had it chosen to resolve the ambiguity presented by the agreements its decision would have been the same as that of the jury.”
• “If this be error, it is harmless error since the lower court, in its opinion for the court - 15 - J-A26040-22 en banc, indicated that had it chosen to resolve the ambiguity presented by the agreements its decision would have been the same as that of the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).