· 1/23/1998
Rich v. Montpelier Supervisory District
Citations
- 709 A.2d 501
- 167 Vt. 415
- 13 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1140
- 1998 Vt. LEXIS 10
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- public employees with property interest in position entitled to oral or written notice of charges against them, and an explanation of employer’s evidence
- disputed factual issue central to plaintiffs retaliation claim precluded summary judgment on qualified immunity
- “As numerous courts have recognized, the purpose of the advance notice provision in Rule 56(c
- “The essential elements of due process are notice and an opportunity to be heard.”
- “the defense is available even if the plaintiff shows that the official acted with the malicious intention to cause a deprivation of constitutional rights or other injury.”
- “The essential elements of due process are notice and an opportunity to be heard.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.