Skip to main content
· 1/23/1998

Rich v. Montpelier Supervisory District

Citations

  • 709 A.2d 501
  • 167 Vt. 415
  • 13 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1140
  • 1998 Vt. LEXIS 10

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • public employees with property interest in position entitled to oral or written notice of charges against them, and an explanation of employer’s evidence
  • disputed factual issue central to plaintiffs retaliation claim precluded summary judgment on qualified immunity
  • “As numerous courts have recognized, the purpose of the advance notice provision in Rule 56(c
  • “The essential elements of due process are notice and an opportunity to be heard.”
  • “the defense is available even if the plaintiff shows that the official acted with the malicious intention to cause a deprivation of constitutional rights or other injury.”
  • “The essential elements of due process are notice and an opportunity to be heard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.