Skip to main content
· 10/1/1979

Rich v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 410 A.2d 528
  • 1979 D.C. App. LEXIS 542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding case was properly submitted to the jury where photographs of two holes in the sidewalk coupled with plaintiff’s description of her fall was enough to permit an inference that one of the holes was the cause of her fall
  • “Appellant need only have adduced evidence from which a jury reasonably could infer that one of the holes in the brick sidewalk was the cause of her fall.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nebeker, Harris and MacK, Associate Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.