Skip to main content
· 8/30/1999

Rich Products Corp. v. Kemutec, Inc.

Citations

  • 66 F. Supp. 2d 937
  • 1999 WL 728329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When contractual expectations are frustrated because of a defect in the subject matter of the contract, a party’s remedy lies exclusively in contract.”
  • reviewing opinions and concluding that fraud claims are barred
  • reviewing opinions and concluding that fraud claims are barred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.