Skip to main content

Rice v. State

Citations

  • 805 S.W.2d 432
  • 1991 WL 7994

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that murder for remuneration is not limited to murders for hire
  • acknowledging that the Court has consistently adhered to broad construction of the remuneration statute
  • “While the definition of remuneration is broad, the actor must expect to gain from some benefit assessed on the death of the victim.”
  • “[T]he actor must expect to gain from some benefit assessed on the death of the victim.”
  • “The State is obligated to offer some evidence of the defendant’s intent or state of mind as related 11 to an expectation of [tangible] remuneration.”
  • “The State is obligated to offer some evidence of the defendant’s intent or state of mind as related to an expectation of [tangible] remuneration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Overstreet, McCormick, Maloney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.